EXPONENT PETRO

FUEL STRATEGY & SOURCING

Compare useful heat.
Choose a viable route.

Assess the fuel your operation can receive, use safely and fund across its actual duty.

Delivered price matters alongside energy content, efficiency, reliability and conversion requirements. A primary-fuel decision and a backup-fuel decision can have different economics.

Conceptual fuel strategy & sourcing environment

DECISION FRAMEWORK

Make the route
explicit.

Use a defined sequence to connect the operating requirement with the evidence, responsibilities and next commitment.

  1. 01 /

    Measure the baseline

    Consumption, production, pressure and interruptions.

  2. 02 /

    Screen the fuel routes

    Equipment acceptance, logistics and approvals.

  3. 03 /

    Compare full economics

    Useful heat, capital, maintenance and financing.

  4. 04 /

    Set the operating mix

    Normal duty, continuity loads and changeover.

Conceptual scope sequence. The agreed assignment determines deliverables and responsibility.

FUEL OPTIONS

Match the fuel to the application

The right comparison starts with the operating duty and the delivery route. Fuel prices alone do not establish the lowest cost of useful heat.

Scroll to compare all columns

Qualitative comparison. Suitability and costs depend on the site and the proposed supply arrangement.
Fuel optionApplication to assessDecision factors
Pipeline natural gasExisting gas-fired thermal equipmentAvailable pressure, contracted supply, tariffs and interruption exposure.
Direct LPGSuitable burners and industrial heatingBurner conversion, bulk storage, delivered LPG price and replenishment.
LPG-air SNGCompatible thermal systems needing a substitute gas blendAppliance approval, gas properties, blend control, auxiliary energy and safety systems.
LNG-derived gasSupply through an established gas delivery routeAccess, delivery scale, regasification and the full infrastructure cost.
DieselCompatible liquid-fuel equipment and backup dutyDelivered cost, storage, emissions, maintenance and operating efficiency.
Other available fuelsApplications supported by a site-specific reviewFuel quality, handling, emissions, waste, equipment suitability and permits.

USE YOUR OWN OPERATING DATA

Compare the cost of useful heat

Enter delivered prices and energy values on the same calorific-value basis. This compares fuel cost only; installation, auxiliary electricity, maintenance and financing are assessed separately.

Fuel A
Fuel B

Formula: price per unit ÷ (energy per unit × efficiency). Equipment compatibility and site approvals require a separate assessment.

Request a Fuel Assessment
01 /

Build a baseline that reflects operation.

Bring fuel records, invoices, output and operating hours together. Separate continuous use from backup use and record where interruptions, pressure or fuel quality affect production.

Compare the same process duty on a consistent calorific-value basis. Prices per kilogram, cubic metre and litre need energy and efficiency conversion before they become comparable useful-heat costs.

02 /

Screen access and suitability before price.

For pipeline gas, check the connection, allocation, pressure and actual reliability; a tariff does not prove extra supply is available. Direct LPG and LPG-air SNG require comparison of logistics, burners, storage, safety and conversion cost. Direct LPG may involve fewer components.

LNG and other imports require a real access route, receiving infrastructure, scale, licensing and financing. Diesel, furnace oil, electricity, biomass and other permitted options enter the review where equipment, handling, emissions, maintenance and environmental conditions support them.

ILLUSTRATIVE REQUIREMENT

The purchase unit is only the beginning.

At 100 BDT/kg, 12.8 kWh/kg and 80% efficiency, illustrative fuel-only useful heat costs approximately 9.77 BDT/kWh.

100 BDT/kgDelivered price input
12.8 kWh/kgFuel energy input
80 %Efficiency input

Illustrative planning inputs only. These values are not company results, verified site data, equipment specifications or commercial offers.

03 /

Give primary and backup duty separate tests.

A fuel suited to year-round operation may be a poor backup choice. Dual-fuel or staged arrangements depend on equipment acceptance, safe isolation and disciplined operation.

Identify continuity-critical loads, changeover speed and the storage or redundancy the customer can fund. Stress-test lower utilization, adverse prices and delayed deliveries.

04 /

Expose the assumptions behind the result.

Calculate fuel cost per useful heat, then add auxiliary electricity, maintenance, capital and finance to the relevant annual model. Treat avoided production loss as a separate benefit supported by evidence; at-risk revenue is not automatically recoverable profit.

Savings and payback depend on the measured baseline and selected alternative. Show the input assumptions and the conditions that could reverse the recommendation.

Conceptual fuel strategy & sourcing context
05 /

Use your records to commission the review.

The assessment checklist organizes consumption, tariffs, equipment and operating information for a detailed comparison.

Where records are incomplete, identify the gaps and distinguish estimates from measured performance. A review can then specify what additional evidence is needed.